|
R&D Systems
universal colorimetric parp assay kit ![]() Universal Colorimetric Parp Assay Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/universal+colorimetric+parp+assay+kit/bio_rxiv__2025__04__18__649305-462-4-16?v=R%26D+Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
universal colorimetric parp assay kit - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
parp universal colorimetric assay kit ![]() Parp Universal Colorimetric Assay Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/universal+colorimetric+parp+assay+kit/pmc07376125-75-12-17?v=R%26D+Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
parp universal colorimetric assay kit - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Non-DNA-damaging DNA-PK activation improving hearing and prolonging life due to NAD + and SIRT upregulation
doi: 10.1101/2025.04.18.649305
Figure Lengend Snippet: a, Separation of MA-5 R-enantiomer and S-enantiomer from MA-5 racemic body by the chiral column (upper). The chemical inversion/conversion of R -and S- enantiomer of MA-5 were not observed in a rhesus monkey administered each enantiomer (lower). b , Intracellular ATP measurement of HEI-OC1 cells with various concentration of MA-5, S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer at 0, 1, 3,10, 30 and 100nM for 6hr. Data were mean ± SE.* p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. DMSO control; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. c , The cell-protective effect of MA-5 S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer against cytotoxicity of BSO in skin fibroblasts from a MELAS patient. MELAS patient skin fibroblasts were cultured with BSO at 500μM through various concentrations of MA-5 S-enantiomer (left) or R-enantiomer (right) at 10, 30, 100, 300nM, 1 μM, 3μM 10 μM and 100 μM for 72hrs. Cell viability and cytotoxicity were measured by WST-8 assay. Data were mean ± SE.* p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001 vs 0.1% DMSO control; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. d, Intracellular NAD + measurement of HEI-OC1 cells. HEI-OC1 cells were treated with 0.1 % DMSO or MA-5 racemate, MA-5 S-enantiomer and R- enantiomer at 3,10, 30 and 100nM for 6hr. Data were mean ± SE. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. DMSO control; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. e , Intracellular NAD + measurement of human iPS-induced inner ear cells. Human iPS-induced inner ear cells were treated with 0.1 % DMSO or MA-5 racemate, MA-5 S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer at 3,10, 30 and 100nM for 6hr. Data were mean ± SE. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. DMSO control; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. f, The effects of S-enantiomer on SIRT1 enzymatic activity. The effects of S- enantiomer on SIRT1 deacetylase activity in vitro at 10,30 and 100 μM (left). The effects of S-enantiomer on SIRT1 deacetylase activity in cell nuclear fraction extract from HEI-OC1 cells treated with S-enantiomer at 10 and 30 μM for 3hr (right). Data were mean ± SE.* p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. DMSO control; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. g, The acetylation of p53 (K305) was reduced by MA-5 S enantiomer. The effects of S-enantiomer on the acetylation of p53 (K305) in whole cell extraction from HEI-OC1 cells treated with MA-5 racemate and S-enantiomer at 10 and 30 μM for 24hr. h , The cellular localization of PARylation in HEI-OC1 cells treated with 0.1 % DMSO or MA-5 at 10μM for 24hr. (left). Poly-ADP ribosylation of PARP protein in HEI-OC1 cells treated with 0.1 % DMSO, MA-5 racemate, S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer at 30 100μM for 24hr. i , Immunocyto-staining of H2AX phosphorylated (γH2AX) of HEI-OC1 cells treated with 0.1 % DMSO, doxiorubicin (Dox) at 0.3μM, MA-5, S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer at 30 μM for 24hr. Representative (Upper). Florescence intensities of γH2AX immunocytostaining were measured (Lowere). Data were mean ± SE. p <0.05, ***: p <0.0001 vs. control. # p <0.05, #### p <0.0001 vs. Dox 0.3μM; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. j , Immunocytostaining of H2AX phosphorylated (γH2AX) of HEI-OC1 cells treated with 0.1 % DMSO, camptothecin (Capt) at 1μM, MA-5, S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer at 30 μM for 24hr. Representative (Upper). Florescence intensities of γH2AX immunocytostaining were measured (Lowere). Data were mean ± SE. p <0.05, ***: p <0.0001 vs. control. # p <0.05, #### p <0.0001 vs. Capt 1μM; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. k , The NAMPT enzymatic activity in vitro treated with MA-5, S-enantiomer and R- enantiomer at 3,10, 30 and 100nM for 1hr. Data were mean ± SE. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. DMSO control; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. l, The NAMPT enzymatic activity in vitro treated with S-enantiomer at 10 and 100μM with or without selective NAMPT inhibitor FK-866 at 10nM ( left ). Data were mean ± SE.* p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. DMSO control; statistics were calculated by One way anova Durnett’s multiple comparison test. The Inhibitory curve on NAMPT activity with various concentration of FK-866 at at 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50nM ( right ). The Inhibitory curve on NAMPT activity with FK-866 was shifted by addition of MA-5 S-enantiomer at 100 μM ( right ). * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. FK-866 alone inhibitory curve; s statistics were calculated by unpaired two-side t-test. m , The binding between NAMNPT and MA-5, MA-5 S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer and FK-866 were quantitatively analyzed using Biolayer Interferometry (BLI). n , In silico study of Mitochonic acid 5 binding to NAMPT. (a) Possible binding sites on NAMPT of MA-5 S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer. (b) The binding interaction scores of MA-5 S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer at sites ( i ) and ( ii ). (c) The binding conformations of MA-5 S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer at sites ( i ) and ( ii ). (d) the conformational dynamics of ligand binding of MA-5 S-enantiomer and R-enantiomer. (e)
Article Snippet: CYcLex, MBL-Life Science) and
Techniques: Concentration Assay, Control, Comparison, Cell Culture, Activity Assay, Histone Deacetylase Assay, In Vitro, Extraction, Staining, Binding Assay, In Silico, Ligand Binding Assay